|
Studies
Validating Voice Stress Analysis
(A Partial List)
|
|
1. |
|
US Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, NY, 2005:
Funded by the National Institute of Justice, the results
of this study were released at the “Proceedings of
the 38th Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences – 2005” over the strong objections
of the Federal Polygraph Community. To quote the study’s
results:
“This study has found that VSA technology can identify
stress better than chance with a performance approaching
that of current polygraph systems.” |
| |
|
|
|
2. |
|
Air Force
Research Laboratory, Rome, NY, October, 2000.
Funded
by the National Institute of Justice, a three-year study
by the AFRL determined that voice
stress analysis achieved an accuracy rate of 100% when
used to detect stress in 45 known-conclusion responses.
(Available from
http://extraafrl.af.mil/news/fa1100/features/detects:stress:feature.pdf) |
| |
|
|
|
3. |
|
Cestaro, V.
Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Ft.
McClellan, AL.
“A Comparison Between Decision
Accuracy Rates Obtained Using the Polygraph Instrument
and the Computer Voice Stress Analyzer in the Absence
of Jeopardy”,
August, 1995. Cestaro
reports that “the lab simulations established that the
CVSA® performs electrically according to the
manufacturer’s theory of operation” and, even in the
absence of jeopardy, which is a basic requirement in
detection of deception, “These data indicate that there
may be a systematic and predictable relationship between
voice patterns and stress related to deception”(Available from DoD web site:
www.dodpi.army.mil/research/research.htm) |
| |
|
|
|
4. |
|
Tippett, R.
Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
“Comparative Analysis Study of the Computer Voice Stress
Analyzer® and Polygraph”, August, 1994. Both a
polygraph and voice stress examiner, S/A Tippett
examined 54 individuals that were convicted sex
offenders on probation and in treatment for their
crimes. His conclusions were: “With these 54
examinations, there was a 100% agreement between the
CVSA® and the polygraph. The number of examinees
that were found to be deceptive (DI) were 35 and the
number of examinees found to be not deceptive (NDI) were
19. As a result of this study, it appears that the
CVSA® is as effective as polygraph, which is the question
this study set out to answer” (Available from
University of Missouri web site:
http://campus.umr.edu/police/cvsa/compar1.htm) |
| |
|
|
|
5. |
|
Ruiz, Legros, & Guell,
1990. "Voice analysis to predict the psychological
or physical state of a speaker". Published in
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 1990.
Ruiz et al. reports that their “research suggests that
psychological stress may be detected as acoustic
modifications in the fundamental frequency of a speakers
voice” and “that the fundamental frequency of the vocal
signal is slowly modulated (8-14 Hz) during speech in an
emotionally neutral situation. In situations
demanding increased ‘mental or psychomotor’ activity,
the 8-14 Hz modulation then decreases as the striated
muscles surrounding the vocal cords contract in response
to the arousal, thus limiting the natural trembling”
(Available from Library of Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
6. |
|
Chapman, J. Professor, Department of Criminal Justice,
State University of NY at Corning, NY. “The
Psychological Stress Evaluator As A Tool For Eliciting
Confessions”,
1989.
Chapman selected 211 criminal responses at random from
2,109 known-conclusion responses where voice stress
analysis was used to test suspects. Professor Chapman’s
study confirmed that voice stress analysis was accurate
when utilized as a truth verification device and
produced a confession rate of
94.8% of the responses where deception
was indicated (Available from NITV®). |
| |
|
|
|
7. |
|
Brockway, B.F., University of Colorado School of
Nursing, Denver, Colorado. “Situational
Stress and Temporal Changes In Self-Report and Vocal
Measurements.” Presented
to the annual meeting of the American Association For
the Advancement of Science, February, 1977.
Brockway’s study reports that voice stress analysis does
depict predictable and self-reported anxiety (Available
from Library of Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
8. |
|
Smith, G.A.
“Voice
Analysis For Measurement Of Anxiety.”
British
Journal of Medical Psychology, 1977. The author
concludes that voice stress analysis is a valid measure
of anxiety (Available from Library of Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
9. |
|
Borgen, L.A., Goodman,
L.I., Parke-Davis Research Laboratories, Ann Arbor, MI.
“Voice Stress Analysis of Anxiolytic Drug Effects.”
Results of the study indicated that voice stress
analysis of the verbal responses correlated well with
the other physiological responses to acute stress
(Available from Library of Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
10. |
|
Inbar, G.F., Eden, G.
Dept. of Electrical Engineering Technion, Israel
Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. “Psychological
Stress Evaluators: EMG Correlation With Voice Tremor”
published in Biology of Cybernetics, 1976. Inbar
and Eden were able to independently verify the existence
of the 8-14 Hertz ‘micro-tremor’ and to trace its
origins to the central nervous system (Available from
Library of Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
11. |
|
Wiggins, S.L., McCranie,
M.L., and Bailey, P. Department of Psychiatry,
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia. “Assessment
of Voice Stress In Children”.
Published in the Journal
of Nervous Mental Disorders, 1975. The authors
concluded that “audio stress can be detected with a
voice stress analyzer in psychiatric patients during the
course of therapy and that the VSA could serve as a
useful tool for this purpose” (Available from Library of
Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
12. |
|
Heisse, J. “Is The
Micro-Tremor Usable? - The Micro-Muscle Tremor In The
Voice.” U.S. House Subcommittee of the Committee on
Government Operations, 1974. Heisse analyzed 91
known-conclusion criminal responses utilizing voice
stress analysis and determined that “Audio stress
analysis seems to be valid in detecting changes in
various psycho physiological parameters so that a
trained examiner utilizing standard techniques can
evaluate these changes and thus utilize the instrument
in truth and deception” (Available from Library of
Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
13. |
|
Brenner, M. “Stage
Fright and Steven’s Law.” Dept. of Psychology, Ohio
State University, presented at the convention of the
Eastern Psychological Association, April, 1974.
Brenner, utilizing a voice stress analyzer, established
that the frequency of vocal stress increased as a
function of audience size (Available from Library of
Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
14. |
|
Lippold, O.
“Oscillations In The Stretch Reflex Arc And The Origin
Of The Rhythmical 8-12 C/S Component Of The
Physiological Tremor.” The Journal Of Physiology,
February, 1970. Lippold first discovers the
physiological tremor in the human voice in the 8-12 Hz
range (Available from Library of Congress). |
| |
|
|
|
15. |
|
Lippold, O., Redfearn,
J., Vuco, R. “The Rhythmical Activity Of Groups Of
Muscle Units In The Voluntary Contraction Of Muscle.” The Journal Of Physiology, August, 1957.
Lippold,
Redfearn and Vuco begin exploring the correlation
between muscle activity and stress (Available from
Library of Congress). |
|
Validation Study Information
From the discovery of physiological
tremors to voice patterns, you can find studies to validate
today's analysis.
Visit the following links for recent information
on Voice Stress studies:
|
NITV®
11400 Fortune Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33414
Phone: (561) 798-6280
Fax: (561) 798-1594
Toll Free: (888) 266-7263 |
|
|